|
Related Topics

Open Space
and Farmland Preservation
Farm, Nutrition and Bioenergy Act
(Farm Bill)
Joe
Pitts' League of Conservation Voters voting record...
Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008
 |
Farm Bill
Recently, Congress
passed a landmark Farm Bill addressing some of today’s most critical
issues facing farmers, related agricultural businesses and the
environment. This bill is of particular importance to the tri-county
16th Congressional District. With total disregard for his
constituency, Joe Pitts voted against the bill and supported the
Bush veto. Happily, the veto was overturned by large margins due to
bipartisan support.
Let me make clear
why I support this new law and why I feel Joe Pitts has let us down
again.
First, this is not
just a farm subsidy act. Titled the Farm, Nutrition and Bioenergy
Act, this new law addresses issues of far-reaching consequence.
The following are
some of the programs that specifically benefit Pennsylvania
agriculture:
-
a widely-praised
$380 million program to address conservation needs in the
Chesapeake Bay region
-
a variety of
energy research and investment programs, totaling $1 billion,
to enable Pennsylvania to establish a home-grown fuels industry
-
the expansion of
the Women, Infant and Children program (WIC) and the
Farmers' Market Nutrition Program
-
specialty
crop assistance and risk management tools which will
particularly benefit Pennsylvania's diverse agricultural
operations
-
the extension
and enhancement of the milk income loss contract program (MILC)
to not only safeguard farmers in times of low milk prices, but
also provide support in times of heightened feed costs, which they
are facing today
-
federal funding
support for state initiatives such as colony collapse disorder
research on honeybees (supplemented with an additional $10
million per year)
-
new federal
biomass crop assistance and biomass research and development
programs, which will support Pennsylvania in the research and
development of cellulosic feedstock for biofuel production
When Pitts voted
to sustain the President's veto, he placed himself once again in the
dwindling group of extreme 'rubber-stamp' Republicans who will back
Bush no matter what. Pitts bucked the advice of many Pennsylvania
farmers and farming experts. According to Pennsylvania’s Agriculture
Secretary Wolff, many of the enhancements in this bill were based on
recommendations made by Pennsylvania officials after two years' of
hearings and compromise.
Joe Pitts clearly
doesn't care about these important programs, which he and President
Bush dismiss as mostly “pork'”. The facts are that, even if all
items that Bush and Pitts deride as “pork” were eliminated from this
bill, it probably wouldn't pay for two weeks of their signature
national program - the war in Iraq.
After traveling
around the 16th Congressional District for the last year and a half,
I know that my friends and neighbors in Lancaster, Chester, and
Berks Counties - both farmers and the consumers they help to feed -
don't see it like Bush and Pitts. Constituents know that
everyone across PA and the nation is struggling to deal with exactly
the kind of rising food and fuel costs, the need for alternative
fuels, and environmental problems that this farm bill specifically
addresses. If you agree, please send the most powerful message
you can back to Washington when you vote this November – send a
brand new Democratic Congressman to represent the 16th Congressional
District, Bruce Slater.
Bruce
Slater is a member of S.A.V.E.
(Safety, Agriculture, Villages and Environment, Inc.)
View the
S.A.V.E website

|